I selected the grammar point “no” の for today’s post after reading a haiku by Ueda Hizashi 上田日差子 (1961-). Actually it isn’t strictly a classical grammar construct, but is one found often in haiku.
It’s cherry blossom season in Japan, and in Akita the cherry blossoms should be blooming any day now (I’ve seen a few here and there that already have). The word sakura 桜 (as in, cherry blossom) appears in Ueda’s poem, but I do not think that this is necessarily a seasonal poem. It does however have a strong Buddhist theme in it.
kari no yo ni iro araba kono sakura-gai
Which I translated as follows:
If there is color
in this fleeting existence
it’s this pink tellin
In a quick scan of my inbox, I’ve found the following examples of no の:
- 来月のテニスコート予約 Next month’s tennis court reservations
- 前期の授業 first semester classes
- 下記の期日 the following dates
- 総合学務課の佐々木 Mr. Sasaki from the General Administration Office
- 会議の開催 holding of the meeting (as in: the next holding of the meeting will be…)
In modern Japanese “no” is usually used to connect two nouns and indicates their realtionship. So in these examples it is connecting
- next month の tennis court reservation
- first semester の classes
- written below の dates
- General Administration Office の Sasaki
- meeting の holding
There is sometimes flexibility with how these are translated into English. For example I could write “tennis court reservations for next month,” “General Administration Office’s Mr. Sasaki.” The order in which the words are translated does not have to necessarily match the order with which they appear in the original text.
In Ueda’s haiku, she wrote kari no yo. “Kari” meaning temporary, provisional, interim and “yo” meaning world, which I wrote as “fleeting existence.” I have also seen it translated as “transient world.” Both ways capture the Buddhist message that the world (life) in which we find ourselves is not permanent.
Spring time is a gentle time of year. New flowers, newborn wild life, and other things around us remind us of this fact. Spring time is also the season for cherry blossom viewing–originally a Japanese tradition that is now celebrated all over the world! Here’s a spring-esque haiku by Kagami Shikō 各務支考 (1665-1731) in which I’ll examine his use of the particle yori より:
kasho yori mo gunsho ni kanashi Yoshino yama
Not reading poems,
but reading war tales is sad.
The poet, supposedly 2nd from the right.
There isn’t a seasonal word
) in this haiku, but Yoshino
is famous for it’s cherry blossoms, so there is a definite connection to spring.
Yori より has three main uses, it 1) indicates the place of origin, 2) indicates a comparison, and 3) denotes the means or method of something–basically the same as in modern Japanese. In this haiku it is clear that two things are being compared: [volumes of] poetry (kasho 歌書) and [volumes of] war tales (軍書). Many people are already aware of Japan’s rich poetry tradition, but not as many know that “war tales” was a popular literary genre, too, from the 13th century and on. So while poems were often sad, or emotional (think love poems and the like) it’s war tales that are more sad.
In this grammar construction the particle yori follows the lesser of the two things being compared. Here’s a similar usage of the particle in a waka poem from the Kokinshū:
iro yori mo ka koso aware to omōyure ta ga sode fureshi yado no ume zo
Poem #33, by Anonymous
I will not translate the whole poem here, just the top part of the waka:
iro yori mo ka koso aware to
The flower’s scent, not
its fragrance, is more poignant
In this waka, color (iro 色) and scent (ka 香) are being compared as being more or less poignant or of causing a sense of pathos (aware). Note: I wrote the flower’s scent and the flower’s fragrance, but I’m not all too convinced that the author is referring to flowers, but is probably writing about people! As in a person’s scent (perfume, cologne, etc.) conjures deep emotions as opposed to the color of their fine clothes, etc.
What do you think? Are war tales sadder than poems?
Does a person’s fragrance stir your emotion more than their appearance?